Teams

WNCS LaChance (Aston)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40 & O 4.0 Women Thurs. evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-24vs WNCV Massey (Aston)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTheresa Hash / Erica Roberts vs Lauren Maggard / Jodi DeVerges6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Yeisley / Jodi Shainberg vs Cindy Bull / Lisa Burleson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Cook / Tina Kinard vs Anna Bacher Brown / ASHLEY MORAN6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-17vs WNCD Loftin (BFCC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Miller / Kelly Gillis vs Donna Loftin / Angela Newnam2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Hile / Theresa Hash vs Nicole Ingle / Lauren Wood6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Cook / Tricia Lancor vs Terry Davis / Betsy Gillespie6-4, 6-3
2025-04-10vs WNCS Manley (ARC S)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesErica Roberts / Theresa Hash vs Rachel Horn / Stacey Schulhofer4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTina Kinard / Susan Cook vs Jennifer Hull / Beate Madden2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Miller / Kelly Gillis vs Leslie Ehret / Hilary Thomas5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & O 4.0 Women Thurs. evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Theresa Hash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Kelly Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Jodi Shainberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Sallie LaChance
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.52
Erica Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Tina Kinard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Cindy Hile
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Tricia Lancor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gaylord Chambers
published 3.5
Jennifer Yeisley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Hash
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Kelly Gillis
57W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
Jodi Shainberg
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sallie LaChance
140W–131L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
4
Erica Roberts
23W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Tina Kinard
32W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Tricia Lancor
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Gaylord Chambers
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Yeisley
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.