Teams

Hopkins

2024 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Winter · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-25vs ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesBill Malloy / Tim Bowes vs Thomas McCrary / Tyrone Crockwell6-1, 5-7
2024-03-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesTim Bowes vs Allen Amir Parvizian7-5, 4-1
2024-02-27vs WHO IS WEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJamie Holloman / Galip Karabulut vs Mel Wesley / Mario Levine6-4, 6-2
2024-02-14vs Stringing WinnersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMason Billings / Tim Bowes vs Pete Bianchini / Matthew Trimboli6-4, 4-5
2024-02-13vs WHO IS WE?Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Bowes / Andrew Lyons vs Antoine Diarra / Dante Paragas4-6, 2-6
2024-02-05vs WHO IS WEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Holloman / Galip Karabulut vs Xingchang Cheng / Jorge Grandy6-2, 6-0
2024-01-29vs Stringing WinnersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Tim Bowes vs Doan Nguyen / Luan Nguyen7-6, 1-5
2024-01-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesTim Bowes / Jim Craig vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-08vs Stringing WinnersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJamie Holloman / Galip Karabulut vs Sameer Farah / Luan Nguyen6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTim Bowes vs Adnan Karimi5-7, 4-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jamie Holloman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.15
Mason Billings
published
3.10
Galip Karabulut
published
2.75
Tim Bowes
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.69
Jim Craig
published
2.63
Paul Juergensen
published
2.62
Patrick Gardner
published
2.60
Samuel Meadema
published
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
published
2.09
Christopher Wulff
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Hopkins + Jamie Holloman4165% games+9.5% vs expected
Jamie Holloman + Mason Billings314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Holloman
62W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Mason Billings
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Galip Karabulut
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Tim Bowes
34W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Jim Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Paul Juergensen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Patrick Gardner
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Samuel Meadema
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Christopher Wulff
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.