Teams

Mi.Then18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-29vs Ma.Biringer18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Rank / Rachel Davis vs Mallory Biringer / Alison Watterson7-5, 6-3
2024-09-22vs Ki.Patrey18C8.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesLori Petty / Amanda Lindsay vs Kimberly Patrey / Julia Kim5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Then / Ana Plachco vs Leah Weinberger / Emily Childs6-1, 7-5
2024-09-08vs Ch.Higgins18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Then / Lori Petty vs Chunhui Higgins / Alexandra Ventura1-6, 1-6
2024-08-25vs Ma.Biringer18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacy Rank / Meghan Howard vs Julie Cronin / Alison Watterson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Then / Ana Plachco vs Mallory Biringer / Zandy Gammons3-6, 2-6
2024-08-18vs Ki.Patrey18C8.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesLori Petty / Amanda Lindsay vs Madeline Finley / Julia Kim6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAna Plachco / Judith Stewart vs Melinda Salchert / Jane Williams2-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs Ta.Parise18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Rank / Megan Smith vs Danielle Wilder / Jennifer Bricker2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Leigh Mullins
published
4.01
Lorraine Bowen
published
4.00
Lori Petty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Stacy Rank
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.94
Ana Plachco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.91
Megan Wu
published
3.79
Meghan Howard
published
3.65
Michelle Then
published
3.50
Amanda Lindsay
published 3.5
3.13
Judith Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Rank + Meghan Howard6357% games−7.5% vs expected
Stacy Rank + Lori Petty303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Mullins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
Lorraine Bowen
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
4.5
Lori Petty
133W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
4.00
4
Stacy Rank
284W–91L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.99
4.5
Ana Plachco
150W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Megan Wu
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Meghan Howard
42W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Michelle Then
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Amanda Lindsay
35W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Judith Stewart
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.