Teams

LTFC YELLOW

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs RRTC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Cranston / Cynthia Vander Pol vs Anja Mapstone / Tracy Hudson6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKim Ripka vs Kimberly Allen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Garson-Wright / Sonja Russell vs Kendra Lord / Shannon Hickey4-6, 4-6
2023-08-28vs LTFC GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet McNutt / Leslie Garson-Wright vs Elizabeth Bendalin / Barb Hedges6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSophia Vukovich vs Maggie Wilson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Harrington / Cynthia Vander Pol vs Katherine Hahn / Maribeth Hanzlik7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs SS-LT REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Ripka / Colleen Carlson vs Alli Berry / Rachel Frisz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Savignano / Sonja Russell vs Taryn Fleming / Dagmar Velez6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-14vs PCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Carlson / Erica Mock vs Lisa Damico Anderson / Jill Hanafee7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKim Ripka vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanet McNutt / Kristi Savignano vs Macey Daddis / Janine Paulson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-08-07vs SS-LT ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesRory Jaggers / Laura Downie vs Adriana Buonassisi / Jennifer Liebowitz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKim Ripka vs Laura Kannaka3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSandra Cranston / Cynthia Vander Pol vs Sarah Schumaker / Shirley Stange6-0, 6-4
2023-07-31vs RRTC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Hardy / Susan Duffy vs Kendra Lord / Shannon Hickey6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSophia Vukovich vs Kimberly Allen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRory Jaggers / Laura Downie vs Anja Mapstone / Tracy Hudson3-6, 4-6
2023-07-24vs LTFC GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Duffy / Kelly Hardy vs Erin Raleigh / Elizabeth Bendalin6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKim Ripka vs Maggie Wilson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Vander Pol / Tanya Harrington vs Lori Benson / Barb Hedges4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Susan Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Kelly Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cynthia Vander Pol
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Erica Mock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Sandra Cranston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Sophia Vukovich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.19
Sonja Russell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Kim Ripka
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Janet McNutt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Tanya Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Colleen Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kristi Savignano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Laura Downie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Garson-Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rory Jaggers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Duffy + Colleen Carlson13558% games+10.3% vs expected
Susan Duffy + Kelly Hardy21658% games+4.0% vs expected
Sandra Cranston + Cynthia Vander Pol2453% games+0.9% vs expected
Laura Downie + Rory Jaggers301656% games−0.1% vs expected
Sandra Cranston + Colleen Carlson8457% games−4.0% vs expected
Janet McNutt + Susan Duffy134 matchesnot enough data
Janet McNutt + Kristi Savignano123 matchesnot enough data
Sonja Russell + Kristi Savignano213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Duffy
75W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Kelly Hardy
81W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Cynthia Vander Pol
28W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Erica Mock
4W–0L career · type M · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Cranston
34W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.22
Sophia Vukovich
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Sonja Russell
45W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Kim Ripka
78W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Janet McNutt
86W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Tanya Harrington
37W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Colleen Carlson
58W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Kristi Savignano
43W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Laura Downie
51W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Garson-Wright
41W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rory Jaggers
50W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.