Teams

DK Sports

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0M

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-05vs Ivory Ridge-HanksLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Killpack / Oscar Alvarez vs Shane Hanks / Jan Dawson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Mortensen / Austin Rynders vs Mark Shettell / Jeremiah Barnes1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJim Dishman / Scott Sanford vs Kevin Bunker / Joshua Squire3-6, 0-6
2026-07-29vs Liberty Park-VisserLost 12
L#1 DoublesRick Killpack / Mitchell Duckworth vs Kenn Dayton / Steve Rogers0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesThad Smith / Oscar Alvarez vs Craig Chytraus / Neal Webster6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatt Farr / Austin Rynders vs Jason Wessman / Dave Carlen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-22vs Liberty Park YardbirdsLost 12
L#1 SinglesOscar Alvarez vs Luis Borunda2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJim Dishman / Nathan Mortensen vs Douglas Kruithof / Zachary Noyce6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAustin Rynders / Scott Sanford vs Jeff Dunn / Christopher Primeau2-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs South Jordan Volley LlamasWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Killpack / Mitchell Duckworth vs Barrett Raymond / Joseph Oppedisano3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAustin Rynders / Kasey Kraatz vs Tomasz Salamon / David Myers5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJim Dishman / Oscar Alvarez vs Chip Thorpe / Charles Bateman6-3, 6-1
2026-07-08vs Ogden TennisWon 31
W#1 DoublesRick Killpack / Thad Smith vs Max Jones / Chris Porter6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMatt Farr vs Frederick Partey6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNathan Mortensen / Oscar Alvarez vs Carsten Lau / Kirk Amidan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Sanford / Jim Dishman vs Jeff Beckstead / Alfred Balch3-6, 0-6
2026-07-01vs Ivory Ridge-HanksWon 30
W#1 DoublesThad Smith / Kasey Kraatz vs Jan Dawson / Charlie Owen6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMatt Farr vs Mark Shettell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Killpack / Oscar Alvarez vs Loren Larsen / Kevin Bunker4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-27vs Liberty Park-VisserLost 12
L#1 DoublesThad Smith / Oscar Alvarez vs Craig Chytraus / Steve Rogers4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRick Killpack / Nathan Mortensen vs Sameer Bhadouria / Jason Wessman6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesScott Sanford / Jim Dishman vs Eddie Fung / Neal Webster6-4, 0-2
2026-06-17vs Liberty Park YardbirdsWon 40
W#1 DoublesRick Killpack / Kasey Kraatz vs David Noyce / Luis Borunda7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMatt Farr vs Christopher Primeau6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNathan Mortensen / Oscar Alvarez vs Ronald Zimmerman / Zachary Noyce6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAustin Rynders / Jim Dishman vs Douglas Kruithof / Vicente Huamani6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DK Sports53191333284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Thad Smith
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Rick Killpack
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.93
Kasey Kraatz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Ryan Farr
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Matt Farr
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Nathan Mortensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Oscar Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Mitchell Duckworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Scott Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Austin Rynders
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.37
Jim Dishman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Farr + Thad Smith8165% games+10.0% vs expected
Thad Smith + Rick Killpack5067% gamesnot enough data
Thad Smith + Matt Farr314 matchesnot enough data
Matt Farr + Rick Killpack123 matchesnot enough data
Scott Sanford + Jim Dishman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thad Smith
114W–73L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Rick Killpack
60W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kasey Kraatz
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Ryan Farr
105W–68L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
Matt Farr
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Nathan Mortensen
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Oscar Alvarez
4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Mitchell Duckworth
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Scott Sanford
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Austin Rynders
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Jim Dishman
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.