Teams

Blossom Spinners

2025 55 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 7.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-05vs The Love BugsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Hardwick / Kay Hendrix vs Kim Lonergan / Melinda Condos6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Guerra / Debbie Sumpter vs Maggie Everett / Lynn Platteborze6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaggie Lakata / Rose Garza vs Shawna McCabe / Roshawna Sloan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lynne Dawson
published
3.52
Nancy Hardwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Rose Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kay Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katherine Larsen
published
3.22
Leanna Davis
published
3.21
Linda Chanler
published
3.20
Lindsay Barton
published
3.17
Talat Shah
published
3.17
Donna Shafer
published 3.5
3.10
Maggie Lakata
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Debbie Sumpter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Maria Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Barton + Nancy Hardwick5163% games+10.3% vs expected
Kay Hendrix + Nancy Hardwick8158% games+0.3% vs expected
Kay Hendrix + Lindsay Barton5649% games−0.1% vs expected
Katherine Larsen + Kay Hendrix4551% games−1.6% vs expected
Donna Shafer + Debbie Sumpter4354% games−3.7% vs expected
Linda Chanler + Donna Shafer7849% games−5.0% vs expected
Leanna Davis + Lindsay Barton3244% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Sumpter + Lindsay Barton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Dawson
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nancy Hardwick
30W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Rose Garza
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Kay Hendrix
30W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Katherine Larsen
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Leanna Davis
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Linda Chanler
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Lindsay Barton
26W–33L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Talat Shah
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Donna Shafer
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
Maggie Lakata
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.10
3.5
Debbie Sumpter
15W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Maria Guerra
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.