Teams

GRC Politz

2025 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-05vs CTC Helmick/ElliotLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Politz / Scott Creel vs David Nelson / Aric Margolis6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChance Young vs John Hussell4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Mongilio / Eric Beeson vs Stephen Blackwell / Jim Kirk5-7, 2-6
2025-02-09vs CTC Helmick/ElliotLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichael Politz / Scott Creel vs Bryce Helmick / David Nelson1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCasey Edwards vs John Hussell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Mongilio / Eric Beeson vs John Wirts / Aric Margolis1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAnthony Knell vs Ramanath Haricharan6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAck Morgan / Jared Cross vs Andrew Elliot / Andy Elliot1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SPRING A18&O have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Knell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Casey Edwards
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Chance Young
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
David Mongilio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ack Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Eric Beeson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Wasserman
published
Jared Cross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Politz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Creel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Politz + Scott Creel8749% games+3.1% vs expected
Ack Morgan + Eric Wasserman4546% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Knell
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Casey Edwards
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chance Young
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Mongilio
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ack Morgan
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Eric Beeson
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Wasserman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Cross
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Politz
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Creel
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.