Teams

Ostlund/Tuplano TBC

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-22vs Edwardson 3.5 40+ WinterWon 20
W#1 DoublesPer Ostlund / Paul Bennett vs Jim Schwier / Joshua Sillers6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJin Chang / Alejandro Trevino vs Jeff Craig / Timothy Cruz4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-03-08vs Zehren: Aim 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Jin Chang vs Chris Semler / Brian Dahlin3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Jov Tuplano vs Bob Christiansen / Justin Miller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-15vs Fling Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Jin Chang vs Don Bauer / Tom Larson6-3, 6-2
2023-02-01vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Jin Chang vs Robert Munoz / Jeffrey Brecht4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-01-25vs Alschlager/Crofut BoBsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPer Ostlund / Paul Bennett vs Tim Theobald / Mark Alschlager6-1, 6-0
2023-01-18vs Ellsworth- Padawans 40+ W23Split 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Per Ostlund vs Derek Fermstad / Scott Lundquist3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJin Chang / Jov Tuplano vs Jeff Sternberg / Chuck Jamison6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-11vs Jossi TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJin Chang / Alejandro Trevino vs Frank Jossi / Ronnie Payne1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Per Ostlund
published
3.50
Andrei Kittelson
published 3.5
3.35
ERIK LARSON
published 3.5
3.29
Jin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Paul Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jov Tuplano
published
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Lawrence Wong
published
3.11
Gene Scow
published 3.5
3.05
Gurinderbir Chahal
published 3.5
Paul Penningroth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Wong + Gene Scow5650% games+4.7% vs expected
Jin Chang + Paul Bennett5258% gamesnot enough data
Jin Chang + Alejandro Trevino2443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Andrei Kittelson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
ERIK LARSON
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jin Chang
134W–139L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Paul Bennett
133W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Jov Tuplano
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Lawrence Wong
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gene Scow
16W–34L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gurinderbir Chahal
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Paul Penningroth
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.