Teams

Tennis Club Of Hastings

2026 65&Over Men · 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesRichard Getler / Alan Kravetz vs Robert Mitchell / Giri Chepuru6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Seidman / Richard Cohen vs Claude Briere / PETER SILVERBERG3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGreg Leeds / Malcolm McLaughlin vs John Hoffman / Warren Sacks6-4, 5-3
W#1 DoublesRichard Getler / Alan Kravetz vs Claude Briere / Albert Conte4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Bauer / Richard Cohen vs Giri Chepuru / Kenneth Raskin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Levine / Dan Siegel vs PETER SILVERBERG / Warren Sacks6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dan Siegel vs Giri Chepuru / Larry Dorman6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMalcolm McLaughlin / Richard Cohen vs John Hoffman / Warren Sacks3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert McCoach / David Levine vs Claude Briere / PETER SILVERBERG0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRichard Getler / Greg Leeds vs Claude Briere / Albert Conte7-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesMalcolm McLaughlin / David Levine vs Giri Chepuru / Barney Softness6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKeith Seidman / Raymond Schaeffer vs PETER SILVERBERG / Kenneth Raskin6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMitchell Berger / Dan Siegel vs John Hoffman / Albert Conte0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dick Martin vs Claude Briere / PETER SILVERBERG6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRichard Getler / Alan Kravetz vs Larry Dorman / Robert Mitchell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dick Martin vs Warren Sacks / Albert Conte6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Cohen / Malcolm McLaughlin vs PETER SILVERBERG / Barney Softness6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mitchell Berger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Alan Kravetz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.62
Keith Seidman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Richard Getler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Greg Leeds
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Charles Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Dick Martin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
David Levine
published 3.5
3.06
Dan Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.94
James Pezzuto
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
David Gage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
David Lerer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Fong Chin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Howard Pavony
published
John Duval
published
Kenneth Kirshbaum
published
Malcolm McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Raymond Schaeffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Robert McCoach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Kravetz + Mitchell Berger25366% games+2.0% vs expected
Dan Siegel + Greg Leeds121650% gamesnot enough data
Richard Cohen + Charles Bauer17265% gamesnot enough data
Dan Siegel + Richard Cohen8356% gamesnot enough data
Robert McCoach + Raymond Schaeffer5359% gamesnot enough data
Dan Siegel + Raymond Schaeffer4353% gamesnot enough data
James Pezzuto + David Lerer2536% gamesnot enough data
James Pezzuto + Fong Chin3442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitchell Berger
62W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Alan Kravetz
86W–24L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
Keith Seidman
101W–83L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Richard Getler
126W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Greg Leeds
66W–46L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Charles Bauer
46W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Dick Martin
11W–14L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
David Levine
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Dan Siegel
40W–37L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
James Pezzuto
37W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
David Gage
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
David Lerer
22W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Fong Chin
14W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Howard Pavony
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Duval
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenneth Kirshbaum
22W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Malcolm McLaughlin
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raymond Schaeffer
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Cohen
88W–51L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert McCoach
31W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.