Teams

BP/Jones

2025 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Men - Fall '24 · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-22vs ATC/BevelsLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Jones / Donald Garrett vs Brandon Kang / Ronnie Witcher6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSteven Niemela vs Jeremie Savaiinaea2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesZiliang Luo / Fred Miller vs Thierry Pagnier / Kwadwo Oworae4-6, 1-6
2024-10-15vs ATC/SalmonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Redman / Vladimir Reukov vs Chad Millard / Vasant Muralidharan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDonald Garrett vs Jianxin Zhao7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Niemela / Nick Chaplinski vs Scott Dougan / Russell Palmer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-01vs BP/BameWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Jones / Vladimir Reukov vs Jeremiah Bame / Ken Lill5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Redman vs Daniel Wychrij3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZiliang Luo / Cam Martin vs Charlie Bauder / Zachary Kulik6-4, 6-2
2024-09-17vs ATC/BevelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonald Garrett / Steven Niemela vs Brandon Kang / Alex Bergeron6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNick Chaplinski vs John French6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCam Martin / Vladimir Reukov vs Kwadwo Oworae / Greg Hankins6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-09-10vs BP/BameWon 21
W#1 DoublesNick Chaplinski / Vladimir Reukov vs Michael Kulik / Zachary Kulik6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCam Martin vs Sean Larsen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonald Garrett / Fred Miller vs Tyler Matthews / Charlie Bauder5-7, 0-6
2024-09-03vs ATC/SalmonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Jones / Andrew Redman vs Chad Millard / Russell Palmer6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVladimir Reukov vs Jianxin Zhao0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZiliang Luo / Fred Miller vs Vasant Muralidharan / Scott Dougan0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Donald Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.75
Steven Niemela
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Andrew Redman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.56
Vladimir Reukov
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Fred Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cam Martin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Nick Chaplinski
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ziliang Luo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donald Garrett
9W–12L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
Steven Niemela
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Andrew Redman
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Vladimir Reukov
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Fred Miller
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Cam Martin
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Chaplinski
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ziliang Luo
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.