Teams

HCC Overserved - N. Borel-Saladin

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-18vs River Hills Raquettes - J. O'LearySplit 11
L#1 DoublesErin Braga / Jenni Carroll vs Tara Titus / Wendy Liller3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Borel-Saladin / Sejal Alvarez vs Irene Burkett / Jen O'Leary6-2, 6-2
2021-11-15vs Grand Hampton Slammers - L. BacardiSplit 11
L#1 SinglesErin Braga vs Beatriz Cardona2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNicole Borel-Saladin / Lauren Erickson vs Raquel Mateos / Carol Snyder1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLaurie Powell / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Anne Marie Lennox / Johnessa Hern1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLiina Simren / Erin Braga vs Kelly Machonis / Jennifer Duglin3-6, 2-6
2021-11-01vs Davis Island Serve Aces - L. NeroLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Powell / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Katherine Cowley / Staci Sobieray3-6, 0-6
2021-10-18vs FH Sweetspots - C. DemingWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Braga vs Carol Guido7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-04vs VDF - P. MooreWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Powell / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Helen Reynolds / Suzanne Huffman6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesNicole Borel-Saladin / Abby Grimaldi vs Sarah Swain / Sibyl Curtis1-6, 0-6
2021-09-20vs Cheval - B. BurdetteWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Powell / Nicole Borel-Saladin vs Connie Dorton / Jacqueline Hayes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Erin Braga
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Nicole Borel-Saladin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Sarah Wallace
published
3.20
Sejal Alvarez
published
3.05
Jenni Carroll
published
Abby Grimaldi
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Borel-Saladin + Erin Braga4352% gamesnot enough data
Erin Braga + Jenni Carroll123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Braga
53W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Nicole Borel-Saladin
71W–41L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Sarah Wallace
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Sejal Alvarez
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Jenni Carroll
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
2.5
Abby Grimaldi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.