Teams

Women - Wednesday

2026 Escambia SOCIAL RS Quads · RS Quads - Summer

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · RS Quads - Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Men - Monday000000
2Women - Monday000000
3Women - Wednesday000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Jennifer Washington
published
2.57
Natalie Nguyen
published
2.41
Dakota DellaFera
published 2.5
2.38
Sara Floyd
published
2.31
Elizabeth Bemiss
published
2.23
Sara Ratliff
published
2.19
Jackie Crysler
published
2.16
Anne-sophie Lekeux
published 2.5
2.06
Clancy Bambrick
published 2.5
1.85
Taylor Tisdale
published
1.84
Brandi Rodriguez
published 2.5
1.81
Leah Cafarella
published
1.77
Jennifer Richardson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Washington
16W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Natalie Nguyen
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Dakota DellaFera
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
Sara Floyd
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Elizabeth Bemiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Sara Ratliff
5W–24L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Jackie Crysler
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Anne-sophie Lekeux
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Clancy Bambrick
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Taylor Tisdale
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
2.5
Brandi Rodriguez
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Leah Cafarella
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Jennifer Richardson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.