Teams

Taylor 3.5 40 Spring23

2023 Decatur Spring Adult 40 and Over 3.0 - 4.5 · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Debra Weaver
published 4
3.39
Rebecca Bibb
published
3.34
Debra Roberson
published 3.5
3.34
Kam Acupan
published
3.24
Angie Harris
published 3.5
3.15
Kay Noller
published
3.05
Cindy Gattis
published 3.5
3.05
Kim McCandless
published
2.97
Diana Light
published 3
2.94
Kelly Frith
published
2.90
Linda Brewster
published
2.86
Laura Reasner
published
Penny Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Light + Kelly Frith7069% games+6.1% vs expected
Debra Roberson + Penny Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Weaver
81W–68L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Rebecca Bibb
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Debra Roberson
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Kam Acupan
31W–31L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Angie Harris
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Kay Noller
43W–29L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Cindy Gattis
7W–27L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kim McCandless
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Diana Light
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.97
Kelly Frith
37W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
Linda Brewster
38W–68L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
Laura Reasner
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.86
Penny Taylor
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.