Teams

Wood/Piedmont 40 3.0W Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-31vs Singh/ARSC 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesAllyson Wood vs LoriAnn Owen1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Sharlotte Brooks0-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesLorraine Rusch vs Emily Owen3-6, 0-5
2025-07-14vs Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Tara Rusiewicz2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCarrie Kerby vs Liz Busch6-1, 7-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Banister vs Rachel Summerlee7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-07vs Singh/ARSC 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Karen Hardesty6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs LoriAnn Owen2-6, 2-6
2025-06-30vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs DEBORAH WELLS3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCarrie Kerby vs Jamie Smedsmo4-5
L#3 SinglesSarah Lopatka vs Tracey Grayzer5-7, 0-6
2025-06-23vs Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Rachel Summerlee6-1, 7-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lopatka vs Liz Busch3-6, 0-6
2025-06-22vs Singh/ARSC 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Radha Singh0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Banister vs Karen Hardesty1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lopatka vs Tina Dixon2-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Jamie Smedsmo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs DEBORAH WELLS1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Courtney OShea2-6, 3-6
2025-06-02vs Busch 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Tara Rusiewicz3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Banister vs Jennifer Ayers0-6, 0-6
2025-05-28vs Johnson 40+ 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesCarrie Kerby vs Ginger Ballard0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Diane Puckett1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Banister vs Jamie Smedsmo1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Cozetta Gaines
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.56
Allison Chisholm
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.45
Carrie Kerby
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.39
Pamela Banister
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.38
Lorraine Rusch
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Lopatka
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
2.5
Allison Chisholm
27W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
3
Carrie Kerby
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Pamela Banister
1W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Lorraine Rusch
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Sarah Lopatka
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.