Teams

Barnes 40 Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 40 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesKathy Pace / Cheryl Bock vs Emmy Biaggi / Kamron Moody6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPatty Craig / Cindy Sumner vs Stacey Russo / Molly Norris5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Billingsley / Catherine Wynne vs Kristina Zemaityte / Leann Spencer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Messick / Monica Billingsley vs Jennifer Murphy / Teri Bramsway4-3
W#3 DoublesAngie Messick / Catherine Wynne vs Jenny Wonders / Faye Halvorsen6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMary Batts / Cheryl Bock vs Tiffany Weeks / Anita Allis6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatty Craig / Laura Vary vs Charlotte Boone / Tammy Tao2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Wynne / Cindy Cooke vs Sue O'Shaughnessy / Lynn Crawford2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Cooke / Angie Messick vs Lara Heberle / Brenda Drewry3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAngie Messick / Cindy Cooke vs Kelly Guyler / Teri Bramsway0-6, 2-6
2025-05-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesAngie Messick / Cindy Cooke vs Lynn Crawford / Kim Edwards6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Pam McAmis
published
3.65
Dell Barbee
published 4
3.54
Mary Batts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Cheryl Bock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Annie Chapman
published 3.5
3.39
Patty Craig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Julia Barnes
published
3.31
Laura Vary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Cindy Cooke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.25
Cindy Sumner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Natalie Koeplinger
published
3.09
Monica Billingsley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Angie Messick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Catherine Wynne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Messick + Cindy Cooke4169% gamesnot enough data
Julia Barnes + Annie Chapman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam McAmis
13W–22L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Mary Batts
30W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
4
Cheryl Bock
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Annie Chapman
19W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Patty Craig
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Julia Barnes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Cindy Cooke
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Sumner
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Natalie Koeplinger
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Monica Billingsley
20W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Angie Messick
103W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Catherine Wynne
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.