Teams

SD 4.5WE Miramar College (SAT)/ Patel

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 4.5 (Sat

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-21vs SD 4.5WE Fairbanks CC/ Doyle (SAT)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Lim / Trishala Chari vs Kendal Texeira / Jennifer Caringal2-6, 2-6
2025-06-19vs SD 4.5WE UCRC/ Fitzgerald (SUN)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTrishala Chari vs Maegen Demko7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTrishala Chari vs Grace Yao1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMikayla Vincent / Ana Santoyo-Fine vs Darlene Gallego / Michelle May2-6, 1-6
2025-05-11vs SD 4.5WE Mtn View (SUN)/ RuffoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMikayla Vincent / Cindy Lim vs Giana Guerra / Stephanie Misola6-0, 7-5
2025-05-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Lim / Mikayla Vincent vs Kristi Gray / Ashley Stone2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-19vs SD 4.5WE UCRC/ Fitzgerald (SUN)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMikayla Vincent / Sheena Patel vs Loretta Warren / Stepanka Hastings2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTrishala Chari vs Renee Schardt1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTrishala Chari / India Hoffman vs Masako Wilson / Irina Shkov1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCindy Lim / Olivia Speir vs Amy Repetti / Carolynne Yen4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 4.5 (Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ana Santoyo-Fine
published 4.5
4.24
Cindy Lim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.24
Mikayla Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Zoe Davis
published
4.18
Sheena Patel
published
4.12
India Hoffman
published 4.5
3.79
Trishala Chari
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
McKinna MacIas
published
Olivia Speir
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Lim + Mikayla Vincent5260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ana Santoyo-Fine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cindy Lim
30W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
4.24
4.5
Mikayla Vincent
47W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Zoe Davis
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Sheena Patel
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
India Hoffman
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Trishala Chari
5W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
McKinna MacIas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Speir
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.