Teams

LeBlanc/55/6.5/Combo/Reds

2025 LAF Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 Laf (55&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-10vs Juneau/55/6.5/Combo/RedsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAriane Gaudet Bergsnev / Brenda Venable vs Charisse Viator / Donna Weinstein2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Lee LeBlanc / Pam Foreman vs Lisa Sudduth / Brenda Fatjo6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatherine Staton / Debra Billeaud vs Katie Vincent / Sally Yocham6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-03vs Broussard/55/6.5/Combo/BEVRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJan Meaders / Denise Roy vs Suzanne Abraham / Stephanie Lassalle1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Billeaud / Katherine Staton vs Mary Gretchen Guilliot / Mary Orgeron4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesArlene Dupuis / Philippa Mueller vs Dwanna Landrum / Susan Laughlin0-6, 1-6
2025-08-29vs Broussard/55/6.5/Combo/BEVRLost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Lee LeBlanc / Debra Billeaud vs Suzanne Abraham / Jonnie Sonnier3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Meaders / Lynn Despot vs Rochelle Disotell / Susan Laughlin6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPhilippa Mueller / Brenda Venable vs Alexis Delcambre / Yvonne Reaux0-6, 3-6
2025-08-08vs Juneau/55/6.5/Combo/RedsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Lee LeBlanc / Pam Foreman vs Katie Vincent / Sandra Huguet6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAriane Gaudet Bergsnev / Debra Billeaud vs Brenda Fatjo / Lisa Sudduth6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrenda Venable / Katherine Staton vs Cindy Mouton / Sally Yocham6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Laf (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Tammy Lee LeBlanc
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Ariane Gaudet Bergsnev
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
Pam Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Michelle Ronsonet
published
2.83
Katherine Staton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Jan Meaders
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Denise Roy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Debra Billeaud
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Arlene Dupuis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Brenda Venable
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Philippa Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Despot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Foreman + Tammy Lee LeBlanc13662% games+13.7% vs expected
Tammy Lee LeBlanc + Debra Billeaud5357% games+6.0% vs expected
Jan Meaders + Denise Roy5454% games+5.7% vs expected
Brenda Venable + Katherine Staton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Lee LeBlanc
32W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Ariane Gaudet Bergsnev
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Pam Foreman
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Michelle Ronsonet
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Katherine Staton
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jan Meaders
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Denise Roy
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Debra Billeaud
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Arlene Dupuis
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Brenda Venable
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Philippa Mueller
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Lynn Despot
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.