Teams

Piette

2026 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Spring Day League - HSV · 3.0 Women 553D

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-08vs DOTYDAYS SPRINGLost 12
W#1 DoublesSummer Hines / Tracy McMahan vs Athena Little / Vivian Pannell6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSherrill Altice / Cynthia Garcia vs Cathy Vanvalkenburgh / Trudy Spearman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Rieniets / Velvet Hopkins vs Barbara Doty / Pam Anderson3-6, 5-7
2026-04-03vs Ashcraft 3.0 55+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDorothy Patterson / Beth Berry vs Cindy Davis / Lori Bond6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Caplice / Mary Wright vs Julie Ashcraft / Sue Rogers3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSherrill Altice / Cynthia Garcia vs Sarah Kuo / Sharon Houston2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-31vs DOTYDAYS SPRINGLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Piette / Rebecca Rieniets vs Debbie Perry / Jean Wells2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Berry / Dorothy Patterson vs Barbara Doty / Christine Mannor6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Caplice / Carol Irle vs Cathy Vanvalkenburgh / Ann Creager6-2, 6-2
2026-03-30vs Ashcraft 3.0 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesSummer Hines / Carol Irle vs Rebecca Moore / Cyndi Wilson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Caplice / Beth Berry vs Julie Ashcraft / Shannon Lindig6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDorothy Patterson / Velvet Hopkins vs Debra Harvel / Selina Parrish6-3, 6-2
2026-03-25vs Ashcraft 3.0 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Berry / Dorothy Patterson vs Julie Ashcraft / Sue Rogers7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSherrill Altice / Rebecca Rieniets vs Sarah Kuo / Sharon Houston4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-23vs Ashcraft 3.0 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesDorothy Patterson / Tracy McMahan vs Sue Rogers / Cindy Davis6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSummer Hines / Carol Irle vs Rebecca Moore / Sharon Houston6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSherrill Altice / Linda Caplice vs Sarah Kuo / Cyndi Wilson6-1, 6-4
2026-03-11vs DOTYDAYS SPRINGWon 21
L#1 DoublesVelvet Hopkins / Cheryl Piette vs Christine Mannor / Farrow Herbert2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTracy McMahan / Beth Berry vs Barbara Doty / Sheri Rustic7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSummer Hines / Mary Wright vs Jean Wells / Terri Good6-0, 6-2
2026-03-03vs DOTYDAYS SPRINGLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Wright / Carol Irle vs Farrow Herbert / Cathy Vanvalkenburgh6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Berry / Linda Caplice vs Susan Canada / Christine Mannor4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTracy McMahan / Velvet Hopkins vs Barbara Doty / Debbie Perry6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women 553D
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DOTYDAYS SPRING7117718169
2Piette44131122186
3Ashcraft 3.0 55+1761839263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Summer Hines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Carol Irle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Dorothy Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Linda Caplice
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.78
Tracy McMahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Sherrill Altice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Rebecca Rieniets
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Velvet Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Cheryl Piette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Caplice + Summer Hines5064% games+6.8% vs expected
Carol Irle + Summer Hines6459% games−4.3% vs expected
Velvet Hopkins + Cheryl Piette044 matchesnot enough data
Summer Hines + Rebecca Rieniets134 matchesnot enough data
Sherrill Altice + Linda Caplice303 matchesnot enough data
Sherrill Altice + Rebecca Rieniets213 matchesnot enough data
Tracy McMahan + Linda Caplice213 matchesnot enough data
Tracy McMahan + Summer Hines303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Hines
37W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Carol Irle
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Dorothy Patterson
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Linda Caplice
24W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Tracy McMahan
34W–40L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Sherrill Altice
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Rebecca Rieniets
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Velvet Hopkins
18W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Cheryl Piette
7W–26L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.