Teams

Choy

2026 18&Over Men Manhattan · 5.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.60 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs HaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRuo Chen / Andy Dong vs Ted Berkowitz / Naveen Nath6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesPrathirath Polepally vs Kevin Huynh4-6, 4-6
2026-07-07vs Metro: TomasiniLost 02
L#1 DoublesPrathirath Polepally / John Lindberg vs Sebastian Schneider / JORGE GODOY GOMIS3-6, 1-4
L#1 SinglesRuo Chen vs Manuel Barroetavena4-6
2026-06-28vs El-Haj AhmadLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicolas Gritz / Daniel Tsyvin vs Mikhail Belov / Daniel Cooper6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Reiner vs Sean Ko6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRuo Chen / John Lindberg vs Matthew Demichiel / Robert Scheuing5-7, 5-3
2026-06-16vs DiChiara/OwenLost 12
L#1 DoublesPrathirath Polepally / Serge Verdoux vs Gerald Dichiara / Mark Schlecker5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCasey Schnabel vs Maxwell McDonald2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Bartok / Nicolas Gritz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-07vs Metro: TomasiniLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Tsyvin / Ruo Chen vs David Hannon / Ben Shapiro2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSam Dern vs Sebastian Schneider2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Dong / GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN vs Nikola Djordjevic / JORGE GODOY GOMIS3-6, 3-6
2026-05-20vs El-Haj AhmadWon 21
L#1 DoublesNicolas Gritz / Daniel Tsyvin vs Mohammad El-Haj Ahmad / Daniel Cooper3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Reiner vs Matthew Demichiel1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPrathirath Polepally / Andy Dong vs Jonah Epstein / Michael Mintz5-7, 5-3
2026-05-12vs DiChiara/OwenLost 12
L#1 DoublesPrathirath Polepally / Sam Dern vs Michael Owen / Tim Zelikovsky3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCasey Schnabel vs Dillon McKenzie3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Lindberg / Matthew Sachs vs Gerald Dichiara / Wade Tucker6-4, 6-4
2026-05-03vs HaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Reiner / Nicolas Gritz vs Nathan Reekie / Kevin Ha6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndy Dong vs Benjamin Maffa3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Lindberg / Vinny Ahluwalia vs Wesley Maddox / Naveen Nath0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
Andy Dong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.74
Ruo Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.68
Joseph Reiner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.65
Prathirath Polepally
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.63
Nicolas Gritz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.62
Daniel Tsyvin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
John Lindberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.39
Casey Schnabel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.32
Sam Dern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.25
Serge Verdoux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Matthew Sachs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.20
Alvin Choy
published 3.5
Matthew Bartok
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vinny Ahluwalia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Dern + Matthew Sachs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andy Dong
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.75
Ruo Chen
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.74
Joseph Reiner
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.68
Prathirath Polepally
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.65
Nicolas Gritz
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
4.63
5
Daniel Tsyvin
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.62
John Lindberg
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
4.39
5
Casey Schnabel
79W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
4.39
Sam Dern
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
4.32
Serge Verdoux
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
Matthew Sachs
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN
47W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
3.5
Alvin Choy
64W–47L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Matthew Bartok
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vinny Ahluwalia
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.