Teams

ST MARY 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Zora Voss
published
3.32
Jennifer Bahm
published
3.25
Susan Rossi
published
3.25
Andrea Hogan
published 3.5
3.23
Nicole Leong
published
3.19
Katie Giori
published
3.17
Lisa Haskell
published
3.16
Mia Dennis
published
3.14
Rachel Schmidt
published
3.12
Diana Corbin
published 3.5
2.98
Meghan Jacobowitz
published
2.78
Sushma Nallapeta
published
2.76
Erin Garfin
published
2.75
Beth Topor
published 3
2.70
Alex Kudlicki
published 3
2.54
Akanksha Busley
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Corbin + Rachel Schmidt224 matchesnot enough data
Mia Dennis + Diana Corbin123 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Hogan + Jennifer Bahm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zora Voss
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Jennifer Bahm
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Susan Rossi
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Andrea Hogan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Nicole Leong
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Katie Giori
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Lisa Haskell
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Mia Dennis
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Rachel Schmidt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Diana Corbin
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Meghan Jacobowitz
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Sushma Nallapeta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
Erin Garfin
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Beth Topor
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Alex Kudlicki
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Akanksha Busley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.