← Teams

SHC-O'Hollaren

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.96
Karen Ohollaren
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.92
Andrea Findley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.78
Michelle Beilstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Paul OHollaren
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jason Hyde
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Kiersten Lake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Mark Beilstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Michael Ogden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Gina Meyer
published 0
—
Mike Booth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results7 ties
2022-11-20Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAndrea Findley / Mark Beilstein vs Andy Bracken / Gabriela McIntosh3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChanon Ogden / Michael Ogden vs KEELEY PLOMBON / Alex McIntosh7-5, 6-4
2022-11-13Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMike Booth / Kiersten Lake vs Jeri Finn / John Magaddino7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Beilstein / Mark Beilstein vs Michele Desmarais / Zachary Wright6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-29Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJason Hyde / Christina Wright vs Ray Baxter / Alana Rhea6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErik Bucher / Amy Bucher vs Mark Muckerheide / Cheryl Geisler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Ogden / Andrea Findley vs Charles Hahn / Donna Baxter6-0, 6-2
2022-10-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPaul OHollaren / Karen Ohollaren vs Jinquan Wu / Corey Buchanan6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Hyde / Michelle Beilstein vs John Liao / Xiaolu Huang6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMike Booth / Kiersten Lake vs Justin Shull / Archana Ravi6-3, 6-1
2022-10-09Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMike Booth / Kiersten Lake vs Nina Bakos / Chris MacMillan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJason Hyde / Lisa Barsotti vs Annette Hill / Gabor Muskat7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Ohollaren / Paul OHollaren vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-24Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAmy Bucher / Erik Bucher vs Shaoping Lin / Christina Bergstrom6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Wright / Jason Hyde vs Pete Kovalenko / Jennifer Bane6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChanon Ogden / Michael Ogden vs Charles Stewart / Lynne Nieda6-4, 6-4
2022-09-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Mike Booth vs Megan Clifford / Murray Jansen6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Erik Bucher vs Suki Birge / Michael Jansen6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Ohollaren / Paul OHollaren vs Susan Rolfe / PHAT Lee6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4
Karen Ohollaren
116W–61L career
0%88%12%
3.96
4
Andrea Findley
95W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.92
4
Michelle Beilstein
99W–72L career
0%99%0%
3.78
3.5
Paul OHollaren
61W–25L career
0%70%30%
3.54
3.5
Jason Hyde
53W–41L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
Mark Beilstein
56W–38L career
13%87%0%
3.09
3.5
Michael Ogden
38W–23L career
27%72%1%
3.08
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82
0
Gina Meyer
28W–17L career
not enough data
—
0
Mike Booth
15W–18L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.