Teams

Trilevel Womens 3.0-4.0- Anel Alejandro

2023 Tri Level 18 & Over 3.0-4.0 · 18+ 3.0-4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.89 / PUERTO RICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18+ 3.0-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Jinelis Marrero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Antonia Adrover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Damaris Vale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Sylnes Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Cristina Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Mary Flores Castro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Jomayra Marrero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Viviana Vidal Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Irene Feliu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Yelitza Urbina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Anel Alejandro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Maria Celeste Colberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Medina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Faccio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Faccio + Melanie Medina4254% games+12.3% vs expected
Sylnes Centeno + Antonia Adrover22564% games+3.0% vs expected
Cristina Rivera + Mary Flores Castro91151% games−0.2% vs expected
Patricia Faccio + Anel Alejandro3347% games−5.0% vs expected
Damaris Vale + Antonia Adrover4356% gamesnot enough data
Anel Alejandro + Maria Celeste Colberg1643% gamesnot enough data
Mary Flores Castro + Jomayra Marrero2445% gamesnot enough data
Mary Flores Castro + Viviana Vidal Rodriguez3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jinelis Marrero
63W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Antonia Adrover
115W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Damaris Vale
70W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Sylnes Centeno
101W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Cristina Rivera
34W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Mary Flores Castro
122W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Jomayra Marrero
104W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.64
Viviana Vidal Rodriguez
34W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Irene Feliu
148W–96L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3
Yelitza Urbina
101W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Anel Alejandro
83W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
Maria Celeste Colberg
88W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Medina
31W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Faccio
51W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.