Teams

Mystery Team 4.0M

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-16vs AK - Glacier BallsLost 05
L#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Marco Terracciano vs Phu Ngo / Jonathon Taylor6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnthony Brooks vs Allen Clendaniel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChris Owens / Alan Green vs Curtis Nelson / NOEL LASTIMOSO1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKyle Stone vs Dane Markell0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Sen Tan vs Christian Dougherty / Jay Green3-6, 2-6
2021-05-16vs AK - Glacier BallsLost 05
L#1 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Marco Terracciano vs Reed Lekander / Dane Markell0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChris Owens vs Curtis Nelson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Green / Kyle Stone vs Christian Dougherty / Preecha Pongphai0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJoe Buckwalter vs John Carlson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSen Tan / BOHYUN BAHNG vs Allen Clendaniel / Jonathon Taylor1-6, 0-6
2021-05-15vs AK - Glacier BallsLost 05
L#1 DoublesAlan Green / Joe Buckwalter vs Phu Ngo / Jay Green0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMarco Terracciano vs John Carlson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Stone / Willy Stone vs Preecha Pongphai / NOEL LASTIMOSO2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBOHYUN BAHNG vs Dane Markell0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Owens / Sen Tan vs Reed Lekander / Jonathon Taylor6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AK - Glacier Balls30150046
2Mystery Team 4.0M0301530182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Joe Buckwalter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Marco Terracciano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.04
Anthony Brooks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Alan Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
BOHYUN BAHNG
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Chris Owens
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kyle Stone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Sen Tan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Willy Stone + Marco Terracciano11557% games+9.5% vs expected
Joe Buckwalter + Anthony Brooks271058% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joe Buckwalter
88W–77L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Marco Terracciano
67W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 2 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
0
Alan Green
20W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
BOHYUN BAHNG
5W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Chris Owens
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kyle Stone
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sen Tan
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.