Teams

Ro.Hatlen55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-07vs Ja.Sage55ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesMitch Strobin / Daniel Breazeale vs Pete Padilla / Tad Buck0-1
W#3 DoublesDerek Kalinowski / James McCown vs Jason Sage / Wes Snead7-5, 7-5
2025-05-01vs Ke.Nowell55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Breazeale / Mitch Strobin vs Michael Didner / James Klemenz2-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs Bi.Francis55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaniel Breazeale / John Whalen vs Charles George / Kep Paylor7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames McCown / Kevin Tombs vs Keith Parks / Chip Payne4-6, 3-6
2025-04-24vs Bi.Francis55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesJames McCown / John Whalen vs Bill Francis / Charles George0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMitch Strobin / Kevin Tombs vs Keith Parks / Chip Payne6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-17vs Ma.Combs55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Breazeale / John Whalen vs Mark Combs / Scott McElreath5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMitch Strobin / Andrew May vs Daniel Murphy / John VanDeWater4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Tombs / James McCown vs Dayn Harum / Rick Pfeiffer2-6, 4-6
2025-04-13vs Da.McNeill55AWon 20
W#2 DoublesDaniel Breazeale / John Whalen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMitch Strobin / James McCown vs Larry Essary / Mark Zimmerman7-5, 6-4
2025-03-27vs Ke.Nowell55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMitch Strobin / John Whalen vs Jeffrey Monaghen / David Anderson1-6, 5-7
2025-03-13vs Ma.Combs55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Breazeale / Roger Hatlen vs Mark Combs / Scott McElreath6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMitch Strobin / Derek Kalinowski vs Ken Glanville / John VanDeWater1-6, 4-6
2025-03-12vs Da.McNeill55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Ciuffo / Mitch Strobin vs John Dunn / Larry Leins1-6, 3-6
2025-03-06vs Ja.Sage55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJames McCown / Derek Kalinowski vs Sean Ahr / Tad Buck2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Daniel Breazeale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Roger Hatlen
published
3.77
Andrew May
published 4
3.44
James McCown
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.35
Mitch Strobin
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.22
Kevin Tombs
published
John Winn
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Breazeale
216W–146L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Andrew May
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
James McCown
39W–46L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Mitch Strobin
123W–70L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Kevin Tombs
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
John Winn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.