Teams

Me.Paris18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-30vs Ki.Meeker18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMeredith Piper vs Haley Battle6-4, 6-1
2025-07-16vs Sp.Menzel18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSally Page vs Amanda Moore6-0, 7-6
L#3 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Tracy Copeland2-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs Je.Boney18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Maryanna Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Jennifer Boney0-6, 0-6
2025-07-09vs Sa.Forman18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSally Page vs Jennifer Boyd6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Christina Hyde1-6, 3-6
2025-06-25vs Br.Humphrey18S3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Sara Lilley1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Mary Long1-6, 0-6
2025-06-18vs Ma.Cambo18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Juliana Treleven0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMeredith Piper vs Kathryn Horneffer1-6, 3-6
2025-06-11vs Vi.Gibbs18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCaroline Wall vs Annie Flowers6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMeredith Piper vs Vickie Gibbs6-4, 6-4
2025-06-04vs Kr.Esham18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesSally Page vs Kari Knoblauch6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-02vs Ly.Summitt18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMeredith Piper vs Monica Maxwell3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Lauren Gray6-3, 6-2
2025-05-21vs Je.Komes18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesMeredith Piper vs Alison Sinclair2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Gigi Martin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Meghan Paris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Margaret Eller
published
2.99
Sally Page
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.98
Caroline Wall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Meredith Piper
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.68
Alisa Smith
published 3
2.49
Melissa Ferrell
published
2.29
Gail Scoggin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Spruill Mayhew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Scoggin + Caroline Wall8655% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Wall + Meghan Paris6270% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Wall + Margaret Eller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meghan Paris
85W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
Margaret Eller
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Sally Page
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Caroline Wall
96W–80L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Meredith Piper
29W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alisa Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Melissa Ferrell
2W–25L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Gail Scoggin
63W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Spruill Mayhew
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.