Teams

JTC - Chestnuts

2022 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-10vs ALACHUA/Justis/Women/5.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSriyani Dissanayake / MARY K WIMSETT vs Anne Engemann / Angie Gomez4-6, 3-6
2022-12-09vs Hawkstone - Cox/HillLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargaret Zerbe / Cassie Johnson vs Cara Duffaut / Haesuk Park5-7, 1-6
2022-11-17vs Yonge & RestlessLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Redfern / Alyssa Ray vs Cynthia Lewis / Emma Bredfeldt2-6, 2-6
2022-11-15vs Hawkstone - Cox/HillLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Redfern / Alyssa Ray vs Kelsy Hill / Daniela Cobb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Woolley / MARY K WIMSETT vs Carmen Cornell / Kelly Cordell2-6, 2-6
2022-10-29vs Yonge & RestlessLost 01
L#1 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Margaret Zerbe vs Rhoda Wilburn / Tina Waters1-6, 5-7
2022-10-21vs Hawkstone - Cox/HillLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Redfern / Margaret Zerbe vs Haesuk Park / Jodi Cox4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Alyssa Ray
published 4
2.97
Cassie Johnson
published 3
2.90
Ann Redfern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Margaret Zerbe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
MARY K WIMSETT
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Patricia Woolley
published
2.67
Sriyani Dissanayake
published
2.60
Kristin Graham
published
2.49
Annalize Britz
published 3
2.49
Hillary Turlington
published 2.5
2.16
Gina Ferrara
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sriyani Dissanayake + Gina Ferrara033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyssa Ray
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
3
Cassie Johnson
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Ann Redfern
41W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Margaret Zerbe
27W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
MARY K WIMSETT
82W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Patricia Woolley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Sriyani Dissanayake
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
2.67
Kristin Graham
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Annalize Britz
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Hillary Turlington
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Gina Ferrara
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.