Teams

Dante's Inferno

2026 MIAMIDADE Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-22vs Miami/GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesOscar Orihuela / Lizardo Benavides vs Oscar Garcia / Luis Lamas A6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoe Mozzali / Stephen Cohen vs Arturo Moratinos / Omar Antonio Crespo Nieves2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Lehman / Mark Kessler vs GONZALO GARCIA / Roberto Nieves4-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs TennisAddicts at Tamiami ParkWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott Lehman / Joe Mozzali vs Fernando Blasi / Scott Sime6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGeoffrey Meurrens / Alejandro Sananez vs Francisco Garcia / Ramon Cordova6-2, 6-4
2026-07-14vs Miami/GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Lehman / George Westring vs Omar Antonio Crespo Nieves / Arturo Moratinos3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / Geoffrey Meurrens vs Carlos Aldrey / Bryant Carreno1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Hernandez / Juan de la Madriz vs Lucas Martinez / Francisco Romano1-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs TennisAddicts at Tamiami ParkLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Meurrens / Alejandro Sananez vs Francisco Garcia / Juan Calvo0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesScott Lehman / George Westring vs Carlos Cadet / Ceferino Estrada0-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs Miami/GarciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Cohen / Alejandro Sananez vs Carlos Aldrey / Francisco Romano1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Hernandez / Vincent Turturro vs Lucas Martinez / Carmine Minichino3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dante's Inferno1421327168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Luis Velis
published
3.69
Joe Mozzali
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Geoffrey Meurrens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
George Westring
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Lawrence Chen
published
3.42
Scott Lehman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Stephen Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Alejandro Sananez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Juan de la Madriz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lizardo Benavides
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Kessler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Oscar Orihuela
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vincent Turturro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandro Sananez + Stephen Cohen2742% games−3.6% vs expected
George Westring + Luis Velis7647% games−6.1% vs expected
Lizardo Benavides + Oscar Orihuela185240% gamesnot enough data
Lizardo Benavides + Geoffrey Meurrens3447% gamesnot enough data
Joe Mozzali + Scott Lehman314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Kessler + Scott Lehman134 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Sananez + Geoffrey Meurrens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Velis
17W–11L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Joe Mozzali
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Geoffrey Meurrens
62W–98L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
George Westring
43W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Lawrence Chen
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Scott Lehman
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Stephen Cohen
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Alejandro Sananez
47W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Juan de la Madriz
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lizardo Benavides
31W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mark Kessler
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Oscar Orihuela
41W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vincent Turturro
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.