Teams

LWGO-Goodwin/Bailey Rd Pk 3.5 Wed 55+

2024 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-01vs LSHO-HOLLEY/LNRCLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Forouzad / Carol Geisler vs Anna Bonham / Janice Ingram4-6, 3-6
2024-04-24vs LRDA-Davis/RRCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Wendy Goodwin vs Debbie Noe / Julli Goodwin3-6, 2-6
2024-04-17vs LCRE-Regan/WestportLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnette Mootilal / Brenda Jandebeur vs Leila Riccardelli / Coleen Foye3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Geisler / Brenda Forouzad vs Diane Davis / Crystal Regan2-6, 2-6
2024-04-10vs LSWA-Wakeman/JettonLost 01
L#3 DoublesWendy Goodwin / Brenda Jandebeur vs Tracy Podesta / Jan Hanby4-6, 5-7
2024-04-06vs LSCL-Clancy/Cornelius Road ParkLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Wendy Goodwin vs Linda Blinn / Nina Archer2-6, 1-6
2024-03-20vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Forouzad / Wendy Goodwin vs Beth Schleck / Jan Wildman0-6, 2-6
2024-03-13vs LHNY-Nyquist/JettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Annette Mootilal vs Megan Hartley / Ann Modlin4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Tracy Keill vs Dawn Andiloro / Christine Tattersfield2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoanne Cunningham / Brenda Forouzad vs Heather MacFadyen / Heidi Nyquist3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Cindy Mexcur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Carol Geisler
published 3.5
3.06
Brenda Forouzad
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Brenda Jandebeur
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.97
Joanne Cunningham
published
2.58
Wendy Goodwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Jandebeur + Wendy Goodwin4838% games−6.8% vs expected
Cindy Mexcur + Brenda Jandebeur5162% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Wendy Goodwin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–156L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carol Geisler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Brenda Forouzad
48W–27L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Brenda Jandebeur
164W–219L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Joanne Cunningham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Wendy Goodwin
11W–24L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.