Teams

MILL VALLEY CM7.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 7.5

25 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Frank Young
published 4.5
3.97
Brian Kneafsey
published 4.5
3.80
Bill Graham
published 4
3.69
Nick Bockh
published
3.68
Chris Oconnor
published 4
3.67
Markus Kraemling
published
3.67
Israel Rosales
published 4
3.65
Aaron Klink
published 4
3.65
Joe Boswell
published
3.63
Mark Shaw
published
3.61
Scott Dalton
published
3.47
Paul Rimas
published
3.44
Patrick Ryan
published
3.40
ADAM BAIN
published 3.5
3.27
Todd Niedermeyer
published
Ben Crosswell
published 3.5
Domenico Petrone
published 3.5
3.23
Jonathan Weis
published
3.21
Brandon Lawniczak
published 3.5
3.17
Adrian Fadrhonc
published 3.5
3.17
Robert Swenson
published
3.15
Bill Getty
published 3.5
3.04
Doug Turner
published 3.5
Lucas Hatch
published
William Mcginness
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Israel Rosales + Scott Dalton044 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Ryan + Paul Rimas314 matchesnot enough data
Todd Niedermeyer + Brandon Lawniczak123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Frank Young
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Brian Kneafsey
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Bill Graham
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.80
Nick Bockh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Chris Oconnor
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Markus Kraemling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Israel Rosales
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Aaron Klink
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Joe Boswell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Mark Shaw
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
Scott Dalton
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Paul Rimas
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Patrick Ryan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
ADAM BAIN
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Todd Niedermeyer
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ben Crosswell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Domenico Petrone
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathan Weis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brandon Lawniczak
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Adrian Fadrhonc
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Robert Swenson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Bill Getty
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Doug Turner
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lucas Hatch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Mcginness
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.