Teams

Blankenship/Nashville

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Men - Sunday Daytime

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-28vs Smith/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Mihalik / Gary Thompson vs Steven Anderson / Kerry Smyth6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMike Bolds / Don Caffery vs Terry Correll / Roger Fuhrman0-6, 6-7
2026-06-21vs Smith/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Rowenczak / Ray Brown vs James Dahlstein / Steven Anderson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJay Olson / Michael Mihalik vs Jack Vandercook / Daniel Hayes6-7, 1-6
2026-06-14vs Smith/NashvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesSteve Gaines / Gary Witzgall vs Steven Anderson / Kerry Smyth6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTony Lance / Dan Ostrander vs Daniel Hayes / Jack Vandercook6-3, 6-2
2026-06-07vs Smith/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJ Dennis Covington / Tony Lance vs James Dahlstein / Steven Anderson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Gaines / Gary Witzgall vs Terry Correll / Steve Smith6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDan Ostrander / Gary Thompson vs Roger Fuhrman / Norman Moore6-4, 6-3
2026-05-31vs Smith/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesGlenn Kiger / J Dennis Covington vs Daniel Hayes / Jack Vandercook6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDan Ostrander / Jay Olson vs Steve Smith / Steven Anderson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike Bolds / Gary Witzgall vs Terry Correll / Norman Moore6-4, 6-4
2026-05-17vs Smith/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesTony Lance / Dan Ostrander vs Steven Anderson / James Dahlstein6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Blankenship / John Rowenczak vs Jack Vandercook / Daniel Hayes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Gaines / Gary Witzgall vs Rob Rogers / Terry Correll6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Men - Sunday Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blankenship/Nashville601536102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Gary Witzgall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Dan Ostrander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Tony Lance
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Ray Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Steve Gaines
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Jay Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Glenn Kiger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
J Dennis Covington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Rowenczak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Mihalik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Bolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Blankenship
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Witzgall + Steve Gaines303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gary Witzgall
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Dan Ostrander
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Tony Lance
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Ray Brown
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Steve Gaines
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Jay Olson
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Gary Thompson
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Glenn Kiger
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
J Dennis Covington
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Rowenczak
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Mihalik
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Bolds
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Blankenship
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.