Teams

JKarasek/Murphy (Carmel)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-11vs ASpanjers (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Fitzsimons / Katie O'Shea vs Emily White / Tara Marcel6-1, 7-5
2024-10-07vs KBaldwin (Charlotte CC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelli Narveson / Katie O'Shea vs Brooks Haislip / Laura Monk6-7, 4-6
2024-09-13vs DFricke (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrittany Russell / Rebecca Fitzsimons vs Brooke Winkelman / Kristen Petras7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-06vs ASpanjers (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Murphy / Rebecca Fitzsimons vs Hollie Collins-Dean / Alyse Fuller6-0, 6-1
2024-08-30vs ETurkus (Springfield)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCaroline Dudley / Rebecca Fitzsimons vs Annmarie Ringle / Lindsay Curby6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-23vs SPurdy/Blandford (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStacey Hitzemann / Rebecca Fitzsimons vs Joanne Lindley / Emily Reel5-7, 4-6
2024-08-09vs KBaldwin (Charlotte CC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrittany Russell / Katie O'Shea vs Catherine Ruth Kelly / Gigi Harris6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Katie O'Shea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kylie Holt
published
3.05
Deb Childress
published 3
3.01
Stefania Faraj
published
2.99
Megan Francis
published
2.96
Caroline Dudley
published 3
2.92
Kelli Narveson
published
2.89
Rebecca Fitzsimons
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Christina Murphy
published 3
2.68
Brittany Russell
published 2.5
2.55
Ginny Starnes
published
Jasmine Karasek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Murphy + Brittany Russell123 matchesnot enough data
Katie O'Shea + Kylie Holt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie O'Shea
100W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Kylie Holt
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.20
3
Deb Childress
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Stefania Faraj
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
Megan Francis
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.99
3
Caroline Dudley
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kelli Narveson
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Rebecca Fitzsimons
57W–44L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Christina Murphy
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Brittany Russell
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%10%90%
2.68
Ginny Starnes
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%36%64%
2.55
Jasmine Karasek
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.