Teams

Aldridge - Lawn and Tennis

2024 Sandhills Adult 40 & over · 3.5 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-01vs Morgan - MazarickWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmity Aldridge / Lisa Nixon vs Sandra Jones / Laurie Cherry6-2, 7-5
2024-04-24vs Morgan - MazarickWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmity Aldridge / Lily Li vs Sajata Strong / Sandra Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-17vs Morgan - MazarickWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmity Aldridge / Ann Tucker vs Michelle Benson / Jennifer Hill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Voltz vs Pia Thompson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-10vs Morgan - MazarickWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Voltz vs Sajata Strong1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-26vs Morgan - MazarickWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Voltz vs Dawn Dixon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Nixon / Mary Howard vs Marion Bryan / Lynn Floyd6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-21vs Morgan - MazarickLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Voltz vs Dawn Dixon2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-20vs Morgan - MazarickWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmity Aldridge / Ann Tucker vs Sajata Strong / Michelle Benson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Voltz vs Sandra Jones4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristen Thayer / Lisa Nixon vs Sandra Jones / Emily Morgan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Leigh Carter
published
3.56
Ann Tucker
published 3.5
3.50
Mary Howard
published
3.50
Shannon Allison
published
3.35
Amity Aldridge
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.27
Victoria Adkins
published
3.25
Carolyn Voltz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jessica Kittrell
published
3.21
Christen Thayer
published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Patricia Zoellner
published
Michele Keel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Tucker + Amity Aldridge6656% games+6.7% vs expected
Lisa Nixon + Amity Aldridge5745% gamesnot enough data
Amity Aldridge + Christen Thayer4650% gamesnot enough data
Mary Howard + Christen Thayer5151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Carter
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Ann Tucker
63W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
Mary Howard
49W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Shannon Allison
31W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Amity Aldridge
113W–101L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Victoria Adkins
41W–37L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Carolyn Voltz
70W–107L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Jessica Kittrell
24W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christen Thayer
141W–87L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Nixon
99W–156L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Patricia Zoellner
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Michele Keel
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.