Teams

NP-Woodard

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-05vs EW-IND-MehlenbacherLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Mainer / Sri Purohith vs Bryan Coles / Walter Josephson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDoug Bost / Duane Wilson vs Todd Samuel / Stephen Allen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarc Mccray / Jeff Spray vs Kent Ozkardesh / Lee Penick7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-11-05vs WRAC-WengreenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Mainer / Sri Purohith vs Brad Sourbeer / George Valison6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDoug Bost / Steve Kuka vs Keith Collins / Michael Bordner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Spray / Duane Wilson vs Charles Wengreen / Brian Gundersen3-6, 1-6
2022-11-04vs WCCP-OverservedLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Mainer / Sri Purohith vs Eric Seaman / Jerry Henderson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Bost / Jon Heimbigner vs Bill Schoultz / Pat Nevin4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Spray / Duane Wilson vs Tim Kast / Clinton Marvel3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Marshall2163670
2EW-IND-Mehlenbacher21631079
3WRAC-Wengreen12361389
4NP-Woodard03271493
5YTC-Ferguson03181697

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Michael Mainer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Steve Kuka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Doug Bost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Duane Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jeff Spray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Heimbigner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Woodard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Kuka + Michael Mainer4152% games+6.8% vs expected
Steve Kuka + Doug Bost2546% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Woodard + Doug Bost2349% gamesnot enough data
Duane Wilson + Doug Bost2346% gamesnot enough data
Doug Bost + Michael Mainer134 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Woodard + Steve Kuka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Mainer
18W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Steve Kuka
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Doug Bost
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Duane Wilson
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Spray
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Heimbigner
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Shawn Woodard
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.