Teams

SFV LLW - CalabasHoles

2023 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesEric Gonda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-11vs SFV - Balboa GamersWon 20
W#1 DoublesBruce Man-Son-Hing / Eric Gonda vs Steven Lau / Gabriel Yassky7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNicholas de Goede / Trevor Bach vs Joshua Gurevich / James Lee6-1, 6-3
2023-05-28vs SFV - Balboa GamersWon 10
W#1 SinglesNicholas de Goede vs Tefft Smith6-4, 6-2
2023-05-07vs SFV - Club OsaWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas de Goede / Jason Gorman vs Saeed Saed / JericPaul Elchico6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Sutman
published 5
4.51
Hans Hettich
published
4.34
Shane Garrett
published
4.30
Jason Gorman
published
4.20
Eric Gonda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.16
Nicholas de Goede
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Bill Willis
published 4.5
4.07
Adam Scott
published 4.5
4.06
Ivan Salazar
published
Eugene Shin
published
Joseph Young
published
Neal Skuro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hans Hettich + Eugene Shin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Sutman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hans Hettich
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
4.51
Shane Garrett
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
4.34
Jason Gorman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
Eric Gonda
66W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Nicholas de Goede
81W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Bill Willis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
Ivan Salazar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Eugene Shin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Young
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Neal Skuro
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.