Teams

AR/Byrd/Pre-Geezers

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-01vs OK/TennisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMickey Robertson / William Stephenson vs Tom Langwell / Larry Stalcup6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFloyd Lang / Jess Vanderstek vs Ronald Hall / Denis McBride6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEugene Kelley / William Brock vs Paul Mesmer / Paul Bemore0-6, 0-6
2025-05-01vs AR/Backus/LRLost 12
W#1 DoublesMickey Robertson / William Stephenson vs John Bakalekos / Bobby Ring3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Byrd / Floyd Lang vs Elliot Esmaeilpour / Kim Backus3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEugene Kelley / Richard Chmura vs Dana Bennett / Jim Pfeiffer0-6, 0-6
2025-04-30vs AR/Wallman/NWALost 12
W#1 DoublesMickey Robertson / William Stephenson vs David Zago / Peter Ritchie6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Byrd / Eugene Kelley vs Stuart Vess / Thomas Crawford1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFloyd Lang / Jess Vanderstek vs Jim Denno / Joseph Miller2-6, 3-6
2025-04-29vs AR/Crum/NWAWon 21
W#1 DoublesMickey Robertson / William Stephenson vs Mike Horsman / Val Robison6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Brock / Richard Chmura vs Robert Tommey / Brian Keck1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJess Vanderstek / Floyd Lang vs Frank Mueller / Kevin McCotter7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Mickey Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Floyd Lang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Eugene Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jess Vanderstek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Chmura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William Brock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mickey Robertson + William Stephenson404 matchesnot enough data
Jess Vanderstek + Floyd Lang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mickey Robertson
10W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Floyd Lang
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Eugene Kelley
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jess Vanderstek
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Chmura
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Brock
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Stephenson
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.