Teams

ORINDA CC CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesChristopher Nichols / Peter Sullivan vs Keith Edwards / Brian Hennessy4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Holst / Akiva Elias vs Ryan Lehmer / Chris Alexander7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Sorenson / Scott Sorenson vs Brian R Wills / Garvin Tom5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJonathan Harris / Peter Sullivan vs Parshudar Poonamallee Kothandaraman / Glenn Teixeira1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Sorenson / Scott Sorenson vs Vikram Kadi / Steven Lehmer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Holst / Christopher Nichols vs Eugene Beyder / Thomas Lyhne6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Craig Straub
published 4.5
4.03
Christopher Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Akiva Elias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Peter Holst
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.85
Alton Schmitt
published 4
3.81
Matt Carrere
published
3.79
Robert Sorenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Jonathan Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Ken Mccormick
published
3.69
Harry van Meines
published
3.66
Jake Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Joshua Leonard
published
Jeffrey Maier
published
Scott Sorenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Nichols + Harry van Meines314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Straub
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Christopher Nichols
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.03
4.5
Akiva Elias
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.91
Peter Holst
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Alton Schmitt
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Matt Carrere
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Robert Sorenson
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Jonathan Harris
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Ken Mccormick
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Harry van Meines
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Jake Stewart
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
Joshua Leonard
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Jeffrey Maier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Sorenson
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.