Teams

C 5.5W WE1 O'Hara

2023 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-07vs C 5.5W CV UrbanowskiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesZoey Holguin / Lindsey Self vs Lisa Manis / Carrie Fromson5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Deyo / Kate OHara vs Ellen Lucey / Krista Ensign6-3, 7-5
2023-03-17vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarla Stachiw / Marcy Gould vs Jennifer Zidar / Jennifer Allan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Davis / Janelle Siebenschuh vs Mindy Qua / Susan Wiley1-6, 4-6
2023-02-24vs C 5.5W CV UrbanowskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKasie Burgess / Laura Deyo vs Jennifer Marthe / Krista Ensign6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKate OHara / Carla Stachiw vs Ellen Lucey / Betsey Poe1-6, 0-6
2023-02-03vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Mileti / Laura Deyo vs Jennifer Allan / Leigh Strawser6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMeredith Fox / Janelle Siebenschuh vs Mindy Qua / Esther McElhinney6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKate OHara / Carla Stachiw vs Gail Vogel / Yeva Dade6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Kasie Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Meredith Fox
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.90
Laura Suglia-Isgro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Laura Deyo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Linda Mileti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Janelle Siebenschuh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Carla Stachiw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Kate OHara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Erin Riddle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Lawrence
published
Janet Davis
published
Lindsey Self
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marcy Gould
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Zoey Holguin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Mileti + Laura Deyo9554% games+3.9% vs expected
Meredith Fox + Carla Stachiw4161% games+2.9% vs expected
Kasie Burgess + Laura Suglia-Isgro5749% games+1.7% vs expected
Kate OHara + Laura Deyo2448% games−1.4% vs expected
Laura Deyo + Laura Suglia-Isgro3443% games−7.9% vs expected
Kate OHara + Carla Stachiw1428% gamesnot enough data
Meredith Fox + Laura Suglia-Isgro404 matchesnot enough data
Kasie Burgess + Carla Stachiw314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kasie Burgess
66W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Meredith Fox
66W–31L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Laura Suglia-Isgro
65W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Laura Deyo
55W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Linda Mileti
26W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Janelle Siebenschuh
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Carla Stachiw
37W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Kate OHara
53W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Erin Riddle
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Amy Lawrence
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Davis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Self
5W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcy Gould
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Zoey Holguin
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.