Teams

KRyan-HVCC

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-30vs LWu-DFCLost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Everett vs Taylor Harding0-6, 4-6
2025-06-27vs LWu-DFCLost 02
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Everett vs Lindsey Wu2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Huckabee vs Marcelle Scheyer1-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs LWu-DFCLost 01
L#1 SinglesSterling Ingui vs Paige Giguere2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-09vs LWu-DFCLost 02
L#2 SinglesValerie Michael vs Diane Allen5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSterling Ingui vs Lindsey Wu5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-02Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Beth Anderson1-6, 1-6
2025-05-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSterling Ingui vs Diane Allen2-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs LWu-DFCLost 12
L#1 SinglesKensy Ryan vs Beth Anderson1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Everett vs Palen Mallory4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Marcelle Scheyer7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-05vs LWu-DFCLost 01
L#1 SinglesValerie Michael vs Palen Mallory2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Betsy Euler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.95
Joanie Preyer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Lauren Powell
published
2.86
Valerie Michael
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.69
Elizabeth Everett
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.56
Kensy Ryan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Sterling Ingui
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.35
Emily Huckabee
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Euler + Valerie Michael033 matchesnot enough data
Kensy Ryan + Valerie Michael123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsy Euler
140W–108L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Joanie Preyer
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lauren Powell
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Valerie Michael
58W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Elizabeth Everett
13W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Kensy Ryan
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Sterling Ingui
43W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Emily Huckabee
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.