Teams

ETC-Racq Pack-Brown

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-11vs MC-Diamonds-WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rawlinson / Christina Ntouniaoglou vs Elisabeth Newkirk / Jill LaRosa1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTina Allen vs Rosalind Kitikiatisak6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPallavi Taleppadi / Chelsea Hua vs Mara White / Rita Yang0-6, 1-6
2021-06-05vs CAC/SL-BetancourtLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rawlinson / Tina Allen vs Carisa Betancourt / Jennifer Conner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuki Brown / Pallavi Taleppadi vs Elena Dvornaya / Heather Slee2-6, 1-6
2021-05-30vs CAC/SL-BetancourtLost 01
L#1 DoublesPallavi Taleppadi / Daeun Yim vs Elena Dvornaya / Heather Slee4-6, 4-6
2021-05-22vs AYTC-BauerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuki Brown / Christina Ntouniaoglou vs Erin McMonigal / Kristy Charles2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Rawlinson vs ANNE-MARIE LOWE6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPallavi Taleppadi / Chelsea Hua vs Jill Walzer / Jenny Ott0-6, 2-6
2021-05-08vs FC-Basha Tennis-LydonLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Ntouniaoglou / Daeun Yim vs Robynn Polansky / Erin Suzuki4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesStephanie Rawlinson vs Courtney Levitsky2-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesTina Allen / Pallavi Taleppadi vs Cheryl Lydon / Adriana Lopes1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCSP-Volley Girls-Thorne7117718165
2BAIN-Carrillo6015310113
3STC-Buhler6217716180
4AYTC (OUTDOORS) Sets in the City-McKay4211714136
5ETC-Holle44131127213
6MI-Kodera44111328223
7TCSP-Double Mints-Steck44131129240
8BC-Doubles or Nothing-Arjal44111329225
9FC-Basha Tennis-Lydon3381022171
10WSC-Raquettes-Onu3371124185
11PL-Porter35111327213
12BC-Freudenberger35101427214
13ETC-Slicetinis-Tang2481023179
14RBW-Group Therapy-Ferleman1771730219
15CAC/SL-Matter1742040249
16ETC-Racq Pack-Brown0621632206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Tina Allen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Pallavi Taleppadi
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.17
Christina Ntouniaoglou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Stephanie Rawlinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Suki Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Ntouniaoglou + Stephanie Rawlinson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tina Allen
40W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Pallavi Taleppadi
47W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Christina Ntouniaoglou
34W–76L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.17
Stephanie Rawlinson
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Suki Brown
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.