Teams

UVTC Racquet Breakers

2026 ITA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 8.5 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-28vs ButtcapsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCale Planck / Carly Planck vs Tony Lew / Miranda Edwards6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Jane Aubrey / Jackson Aubrey vs Gavin Hatter / Diana Cole4-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs ButtcapsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Jane Aubrey / Jackson Aubrey vs Karishma Shah / Trinh Tran1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJason Hardin / Jennifer Hardin vs Mae Alexander / Kolby Silim3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJacob DeRoest / Athelia Graham vs JJ Amaya / Ellie Flowers6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-14vs RL- BergSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarly Planck / Cale Planck vs Lisa Caldwell / Brian Schulz6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTessa Gurney / Jacob DeRoest vs Brigham Berg / Alexandra Patricia Mears3-6, 4-6
2026-08-07vs SM- Henderson/ArunLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hardin / Jason Hardin vs Garrett Peck / Elaine Schnabel5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTessa Gurney / Jacob DeRoest vs Charli Franco / Patrick Williams3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSadie DeSpain / Easton Ernst vs Regan Tieff / Asaf Vos3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-17vs AfualoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAthelia Graham / Erik Soderborg vs Camdin Nelson / Sophia Crosby3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarly Planck / Easton Ernst vs Camden Killian / Afton Orgill6-7, 2-6
2026-07-10vs Full Metal RacquetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Hardin / Jennifer Hardin vs Chris Bleak / Jane McQuade6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCale Planck / Carly Planck vs Paul Gascoigne / Aurie Colligan6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacob DeRoest / Athelia Graham vs JJ Harrison / Angela Bleak6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-26vs Torres Down the LineLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Jane Aubrey / Jackson Aubrey vs Shawn Hancock / Sofia Hayes6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEaston Ernst / Sadie DeSpain vs Kevin Day / Maribel Alvarez1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTessa Gurney / Jacob DeRoest vs Kassie Torres / David Novom3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · mixed 8.5 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Buttcaps401027105
2SM- Henderson/Arun4111411121
3Afualo318410100
4RL- Berg328715138
5Torres Down the Line135714108
6UVTC Racquet Breakers0531225165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Cale Planck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.44
Jason Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.25
Jackson Aubrey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Jacob DeRoest
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Easton Ernst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.78
Athelia Graham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Erik Soderborg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Tessa Gurney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Carly Planck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sadie DeSpain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Jane Aubrey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cale Planck + Carly Planck15069% games+12.7% vs expected
Jason Hardin + Jennifer Hardin7750% games+0.5% vs expected
Jackson Aubrey + Sara Jane Aubrey1439% gamesnot enough data
Jacob DeRoest + Tessa Gurney044 matchesnot enough data
Erik Soderborg + Tessa Gurney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cale Planck
37W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
Jason Hardin
83W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Jackson Aubrey
35W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Jacob DeRoest
6W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4.5
Easton Ernst
0W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Athelia Graham
58W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Erik Soderborg
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Tessa Gurney
60W–62L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Carly Planck
54W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jennifer Hardin
68W–119L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
Sadie DeSpain
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Jane Aubrey
24W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.