Teams

LJLA-Lands/NMP

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 6.5 Men Wed PM 40s

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-15vs LAFE-Feinberg/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Krieg / William Cune vs Ranjith Rajadurai / Shabari Kandasami4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSeung Min Hyun / William Cune vs Robert Lerette / Ralf Strauss6-2, 6-2
2025-09-24vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeard McAulay / Seung Min Hyun vs Craig Lieb / James Laurenson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCecil MacGregor / Keith MacVean vs John Murphy / Edwin Stinson5-7, 1-6
2025-09-16vs LNDA-Daly/RRCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSeung Min Hyun / Beard McAulay vs Ben Ward / Thomas Noyes0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Krieg / Keith MacVean vs Newell Daly / Ken Bush5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-03vs LMHerrmann/PenClub 40+ 2025Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Rumble / Keith MacVean vs Markus Herrmann / Douglas Linton3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Krieg / William Cune vs Tom Mullen / George Chast6-2, 6-4
2025-08-20vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesSeung Min Hyun / William Cune vs Joe Franck / Bae Simalayvong6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men Wed PM 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Seung Min Hyun
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Kyle Payne
published
3.12
William Cune
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.10
Todd Krieg
published
3.09
Cecil MacGregor
published 3.5
2.81
Rocky Pavkov
published
2.76
Stephen Francis
published
2.76
Beard McAulay
published 3
2.73
Greg Razewski
published
2.60
Keith MacVean
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Jose Milo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Cune + Seung Min Hyun14162% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Seung Min Hyun
37W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Kyle Payne
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
William Cune
61W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Todd Krieg
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cecil MacGregor
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Rocky Pavkov
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Stephen Francis
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Beard McAulay
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Greg Razewski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Keith MacVean
34W–88L career · 7 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Jose Milo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.