Teams

Atkins/Strauser

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Kathleen Budnick vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Amy Bucher6-2, 6-2
2023-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Judith Kobin / Sibyl Jarrett6-2, 6-4
2023-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Nancy Atkins vs Judith Kobin / Suzanne Boss6-3, 6-4
2023-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Kristie Leake / Teresa Sullivan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Nancy Atkins vs Jessica Khalili / Shannon Roarke6-3, 6-1
2023-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Courtney Pierce / Claire Bell7-5, 6-2
2023-07-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Nancy Atkins vs Kelly Miller / Pamela Hummelt6-1, 6-3
2023-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Angie Lee / Dongju Won6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.