Teams

BHSC - Hoover

2025 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-04vs FL- FurlowWon 10
W#3 DoublesSue Frazier / Elizabeth Ratcliffe vs Jenny Furlow / Maggie Leary6-3, 6-1
2025-11-02vs ACAC - Acey DeuceyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKate Stephenson / Sue Frazier vs Millie Cathcart / Lindsay Phillips2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-10-23vs ACAC - Acey DeuceyWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Cooper / Mary Voelmle vs Lindsay Phillips / Mary Broden6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSue Frazier / Elizabeth Ratcliffe vs Beth Hollen / Fiona Ngo6-1, 7-5
2025-10-15vs FL- FurlowLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Hoover / Mary Voelmle vs Stephanie Hall / Lynne Gibson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-24vs ACAC - Acey DeuceyLost 01
L#3 DoublesWendy Merritt / Sue Frazier vs Tammy Hertel / Beth Hollen2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
3.71
3.68
Wendy Merritt
published
3.64
Mary Voelmle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Carrie Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Kate Stephenson
published
3.36
Katherine Morris
published
3.26
Melissa Hoover
published
3.26
Sue Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Allison Ewing
published 3.5
Victoria Tremaglio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Cooper + Melissa Hoover4160% games+7.0% vs expected
Farrell Vangelopoulos + Kate Stephenson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Farrell Vangelopoulos
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Wendy Merritt
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Mary Voelmle
148W–99L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Carrie Cooper
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kate Stephenson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.36
Katherine Morris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
Melissa Hoover
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Sue Frazier
35W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Allison Ewing
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Victoria Tremaglio
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.