Teams

Galleguillos/18/8.5/CM/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 8.5 NO (18&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-15vs Stahl/18/8.5/CM/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesIan Sigl / Scott Martina vs Daniel Olivier / Robert Schenck7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColin Meyer / Jay Meyers vs Carson Panovec / STEPHAN WOHLSCHLAEGER6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCristian Galleguillos / Ben Capella vs Javier Jacome / Jansen Petagna3-6, 5-7
2025-10-13vs Bolton/18/8.5/CM/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Opotowsky / Randy Rossignol vs Sid Trouard / Eli Gay5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicholas Hansel / Scott Martina vs Theodore Kennedy / Alex Flores7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIan Sigl / Patrick Flanigan vs Matthew Bolton / William Gement4-6, 4-6
2025-10-01vs Zimmer/18/8.5/CM/CPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRandy Rossignol / Matthew Opotowsky vs Joshua Verges / Joseph Sanford2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesColin Meyer / Patrick Flanigan vs Anthony MacAluso / Ian Dolese7-6, 6-4
2025-09-24vs Bolton/18/8.5/CM/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Rossignol / Eric Landry vs William Gement / Matthew Bolton3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMartin Padial / Matthew Opotowsky vs Sid Trouard / Pat Neely3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Martina / Nicholas Hansel vs Kyle Gross / Eli Gay4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-17vs Stahl/18/8.5/CM/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartin Padial / Matthew Opotowsky vs Justin Goings / Carson Panovec6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesColin Meyer / Cristian Galleguillos vs Robert Schenck / Gordie Verrett6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGeoffrey Hoskins / Randy Rossignol vs Lee Blosser / Daniel Olivier3-6, 4-6
2025-09-10vs Zimmer/18/8.5/CM/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Rossignol / Martin Padial vs Joshua Verges / Joseph Sanford4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesIan Sigl / Scott Martina vs Christopher Bowlin / Nathan Zimmer6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEric Landry / Ben Capella vs Anthony MacAluso / Damon Wang4-6, 2-6
2025-09-03vs Bolton/18/8.5/CM/CPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRandy Rossignol / Matthew Opotowsky vs Theodore Kennedy / Keith Coleman6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatrick Flanigan / Jay Meyers vs Andrew Westholz / Eli Gay1-6, 2-6
2025-08-27vs Stahl/18/8.5/CM/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesRandy Rossignol / Ian Sigl vs Javier Jacome / Carson Panovec7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCristian Galleguillos / Nicholas Hansel vs David Stahl / Peyton Parker1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEdwin Geoghegan / Patrick Flanigan vs Ashley Abbott / Jerry Traigle6-2, 6-0
2025-08-20vs Zimmer/18/8.5/CM/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandy Rossignol / Matthew Opotowsky vs Hayden Bashinski / Joseph Sanford6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEric Landry / Colin Meyer vs Anthony MacAluso / Nathan Zimmer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIan Sigl / Matthew Jackson vs Scott Shirey / Brad Mitchell6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 NO (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Colin Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.01
Eric Landry
published
3.96
Cristian Galleguillos
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.95
Edwin Geoghegan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Geoffrey Hoskins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Scott Martina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Patrick Flanigan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Ian Sigl
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Nicholas Hansel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Ben Capella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jay Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Jackson
published
Matthew Opotowsky
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Randy Rossignol
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Opotowsky + Randy Rossignol224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colin Meyer
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
4.12
Eric Landry
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Cristian Galleguillos
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Edwin Geoghegan
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Geoffrey Hoskins
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Scott Martina
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Patrick Flanigan
32W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Ian Sigl
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Nicholas Hansel
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Ben Capella
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Jay Meyers
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Jackson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Opotowsky
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Rossignol
4W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.