Teams

LOS GATOS SR 55MX7.0B

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-02vs VILLAGES GCC 55MX7.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesGary Serbent / Charla Serbent vs Brett Anthony Foreman / Sharon Bartels2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Lianides / Rose Koot-Lianides vs Ken Leong / Lolivic Shaw2-6, 3-6
2025-09-07vs VILLAGES GCC 55MX7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBobby Freeman / Sherry Keogh vs Perry Lim / Lolivic Shaw4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHuck Hibberd / Katie McBride vs Peggy Seidel / Steve Olson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim Drozdiak / Charla Serbent vs Ken Leong / Sharon Bartels6-2, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Charla Serbent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.13
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
3.02
Huck Hibberd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Wendy Hibberd
published
2.83
Victor Gaxiola
published
2.82
Michel Schreurs
published
2.74
Gary Serbent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Justin Cowling
published
2.67
Bobby Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Rose Koot-Lianides
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Jim Drozdiak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Vicki Velez
published
2.44
Viktor Sokolenko
published
Katie McBride
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Lianides
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Keogh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charla Serbent
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Mary Jo Lee
10W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Westergren
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Huck Hibberd
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Wendy Hibberd
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Victor Gaxiola
12W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Michel Schreurs
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Gary Serbent
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Justin Cowling
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Bobby Freeman
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Rose Koot-Lianides
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Jim Drozdiak
5W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Vicki Velez
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Viktor Sokolenko
1W–15L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Katie McBride
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Lianides
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.