Teams

V - Royal Court Queens

2022 USTA Adult 18 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WE

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-25vs V - Spanish Hills ContessasLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Clarizio / Kim Tavasoli vs Barbara Heitman / Pam Nesseth6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-11vs V - Mission Oaks Kona KrushWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Giammarrusco / Patti Wilson vs Lisa Brady / Lisa Moran4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs V - Ojai Let-Love-WinWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrigitte Haff / Cindy Giammarrusco vs Jacqui Burge / Katrina Rice Schmidt5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-28vs V - Sunset SpringLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Giammarrusco / Patti Wilson vs Catherine Duncan / Sharon Li7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-21vs V - Out of WACLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Wilson / Kim Tavasoli vs Debra Hair / Annie Farkas6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-14vs V - LLW Pierpont-Debra SchragLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Giammarrusco / Patti Wilson vs Ann Gallimore / Laine Miller4-6, 2-6
2022-04-23vs V - North Ranch Ace Ace BabyWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Wilson / Kim Tavasoli vs Beth Benton / Liat Ciardi6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Lan Chao
published
3.53
Mardie Villadiego
published
3.52
Dorothy Lewis
published 4
3.45
Denise Modglin
published 4
3.44
Yolanda Johnson
published
3.40
Kimberly Hasenauer
published
3.39
Patti Wilson
published
3.36
Linda Chan
published
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Clair Telford
published 3.5
3.21
Kim Tavasoli
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Tavasoli + Patti Wilson3249% games+6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lan Chao
23W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Mardie Villadiego
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Dorothy Lewis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Denise Modglin
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Yolanda Johnson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
Kimberly Hasenauer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
Patti Wilson
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Linda Chan
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Clair Telford
17W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kim Tavasoli
85W–106L career · 13 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.