Teams

Escambia/Tan/18&Over3.5W

2023 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-13vs Woodbury - PCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Stacey Martin vs Valerie Wilson / Paige Davis0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-06vs Manziek - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerry Dazet / Amelia Gandy vs Susan Bonsignore / Jacqueline Wallace3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Jessica Gonterman vs Joyce Cook / Suzanne Manziek6-2, 6-2
2023-06-01vs Woodbury - PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Dazet / Amelia Gandy vs Valerie Wilson / Jill Gonzalez6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Maureen Proctor vs Allyson Bryant / Melissa Caster6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelanie DiLoreto / Cherie Tan vs Lori Kizziah / Debbie Hyman6-1, 6-2
2023-05-31vs Manziek - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Lynda Shald vs Polly Armstrong / Sue Nast5-7, 6-7
2023-05-30vs Andresen - PCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs Tanya Hughes7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Jessica Gonterman vs Stacey Sloan / Thuy Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-02vs Woodbury - PCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Tan vs Valerie Wilson / Paige Davis7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-25vs Manziek - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Tan vs Tammie Coco / Sara Davy6-0, 6-0
2023-04-18vs Andresen - PCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs Thuy Nguyen4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Stacey Martin vs Bonnie Bucco / Tanya Hughes7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Terry Dazet vs Gloria Langan / Cindy Andresen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Stacey Martin
published
3.48
Amelia Gandy
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.43
Cherie Tan
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Melanie DiLoreto
published
3.23
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jessica Gonterman
published
Kayleigh Elliott
published
Kris Pritchard
published
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−3.0% vs expected
Amelia Gandy + Dodi Stringfellow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Martin
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
3.5
Amelia Gandy
77W–56L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Melanie DiLoreto
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Jessica Gonterman
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kayleigh Elliott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.