Teams

LATA40/Stitely/CAMP

2024 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-04-08vs LATA40/Robbins/LCTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrandon Doty / Ben Stitely vs Stan Gooding / Jeff Phillips0-1
2024-03-20vs LATA40/Seymour/SSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Doty / Greg Prevost vs Ron Gionet / Rhett Corley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Chris Sinegar
published 4
3.89
Brandon Doty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Ashley Chason
published 4
3.85
Jenkins Mann
published
3.80
Tom Bane
published
3.80
Ben Stitely
published 4
3.75
Randy Westerkam
published
Ivo Vanderzijpp
published 4
3.74
Glen Funderburk
published 4
3.74
Jim Wescott
published
3.71
Zack Robertson
published
3.64
MARTIN CATOLICO
published
3.59
Greg Prevost
published 4
3.22
Glenn Mainwaring
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Bane + Chris Sinegar8263% games+7.4% vs expected
Randy Westerkam + Ashley Chason9257% games+3.9% vs expected
Jim Wescott + MARTIN CATOLICO213 matchesnot enough data
Glenn Mainwaring + Tom Bane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Sinegar
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Brandon Doty
132W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Ashley Chason
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
Jenkins Mann
67W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Tom Bane
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ben Stitely
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Randy Westerkam
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ivo Vanderzijpp
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Glen Funderburk
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Jim Wescott
23W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Zack Robertson
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
MARTIN CATOLICO
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Greg Prevost
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Glenn Mainwaring
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Ranjith Sundararajan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.