Teams

Bienstock/Memphis

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Memphis · 3.5 Adult 65 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-19vs Nobles/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Pressley / Barby Patterson vs Sun Hui Wright / Nan Gallina4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle McCarty / Mary Sutton vs Plum Nobles / Dawn Ton0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Himmelstein / Andrea Bienstock vs Lori Fairless / Dana Holland-Beickert1-6, 2-6
2026-07-12vs Churchey/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Bienstock / Andrea Pressley vs Debbie Bryant / Harriet Dodd1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Sutton / Carol Himmelstein vs Roz Wallace / Tricia Bergeron4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-21vs Nobles/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Himmelstein / Michelle McCarty vs Patricia Alfonso / Deborah Kershner2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bienstock / Andrea Pressley vs Lori Fairless / Sun Hui Wright2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarby Patterson / Teri McDowell vs Plum Nobles / Dawn Ton0-6, 0-6
2026-06-14vs Churchey/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesConnie Lester / Michelle McCarty vs Mary Umsted / Debbie Bryant4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAndrea Bienstock / Andrea Pressley vs Roz Wallace / Harriet Dodd6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Sutton / Monika Wierdl vs Pamela Hauber / Luisa Pagliarulo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-31vs Nobles/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Bienstock / Kimberly MacQueen vs Sun Hui Wright / Plum Nobles1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Sutton / Monika Wierdl vs Dana Holland-Beickert / Deborah Kershner0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarby Patterson / Teri McDowell vs Nan Gallina / Patricia Alfonso0-6, 5-7
2026-05-17vs Churchey/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly MacQueen / Carol Himmelstein vs Pamela Hauber / Tricia Bergeron6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Bienstock / Connie Lester vs Jackie Renner Mills / Mary Umsted6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Sutton / Barby Patterson vs Debbie Churchey / Debbie Bryant1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Nobles/Memphis60171271
2Bienstock/Memphis3361227184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Carol Himmelstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Leigh Norrid
published
3.18
Kimberly MacQueen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Connie Lester
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Andrea Pressley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Andrea Bienstock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Teri McDowell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mary Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.62
Barby Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Monika Wierdl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Bienstock + Andrea Pressley3253% games−8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Himmelstein
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Leigh Norrid
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kimberly MacQueen
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Connie Lester
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Andrea Pressley
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Andrea Bienstock
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
Teri McDowell
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Mary Sutton
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Barby Patterson
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Monika Wierdl
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.