Teams

LVeit/Baker

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSue Jett Taylor / Lee Veit vs Stephenie Mueller / Emily Hancock0-6, 1-6
2022-10-07vs JWOLBORSKY 6.5 COMBO FALLLost 02
L#2 DoublesTerry Jones / Mary Asbill vs Diane Abourisk / Bladen Leippe6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Veit / Dorsey Manning vs Wendy Christensen / Ngoc Tran3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-28vs JEvansWon 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Webb / Lee Veit vs Virgina Wilson / Patricia Zorko6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-14vs RMillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Asbill / Melissa Ferrell vs Diane Allen / Gretchen Swank0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Garside / Katherine McConnell vs Susie EL-Kaissi / Katherine Canavan0-6, 0-6
2022-09-07vs KWakefordLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Singleton / Lee Veit vs Karen Gamache / Kathy Saieed6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSue Jett Taylor / Janice Garside vs Stephenie Mueller / Karen Wakeford4-6, 3-6
2022-08-31vs JWOLBORSKY 6.5 COMBO FALLLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Baker / Lee Veit vs Diane Abourisk / Bladen Leippe4-6, 1-6
2022-08-17vs MJcramerNHCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerry Jones / Mary Asbill vs Clare Bonifant / Rebecca Faries7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Watson / Lee Veit vs Kari Knoblauch / Zoe Whitesell6-1, 6-0
2022-08-10vs RMillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLee Veit / Susan Watson vs Kathryn Kiel / Angela Pleasants5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Lee Veit
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Asbill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Amy Baker
published 3
2.93
Mary Bossong
published
2.74
Dorsey Manning
published 3
2.65
Janice Garside
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Melissa Ferrell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Ferrell + Janice Garside123 matchesnot enough data
Janice Garside + Lee Veit123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lee Veit
83W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Mary Asbill
15W–27L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Amy Baker
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Mary Bossong
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Dorsey Manning
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Janice Garside
27W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Melissa Ferrell
2W–26L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.